
Ive got to hand it to
conservative Christians. Their faith is strong.
When told by a handful of authority figures,
including their own ministers in some cases, that
God enjoyed the first four years of the Bush
presidency so much that He is demanding an encore,
these people simply saluted smartly, removed
their brains, and marched into the voting booth.
The same group that claimed to be basing its vote
on moral values has just reelected
the most immoral president in our lifetimes. I
will skip the usual laundry list of lies and vile,
un-American deeds that history will surely
attribute to George W. Bush. If you dont
know what Im talking about, its
probably because you forgot to reinstall your
brain after voting. What I wont skip is the
impending disaster that these pretend Christians
have secured for our nation.
Just before the election, Osama
bin Laden (Remember this guy, Christ-servatives?
Hes the one who blew up the World Trade
Center. Not Saddam Hussein. Not John Kerry. And,
thanks to the incompetence and stupidity of your
president, hes still alive.) starred in a
video tape in which he discussed how America
could avoid a repeat of September 11. Do you want
to know how I know this? Its because I read
the whole transcript. I doubt that one in a
thousand voters bothered to read this. Its
not their fault, of course. The same right-wing
media that would post full transcripts of Scott
Petersons bowel movements didnt even
bother to post a message from the Pied Piper of
Terrorism telling us how to avoid the next 9/11.
After a Yahoo search, the only site I could find
that contained a complete transcript was
Aljazeera. Ill save you the trouble of
visiting the site and ending up on
Ashcrofts Internet usage poop-list by
publishing it myself. And dont you dare
continue reading my rant until youve read
every word.
So without further ado, here is
the full transcript of bin Ladens videotape
from last month:
Praise
be to Allah who created the creation for his
worship and commanded them to be just and
permitted the wronged one to retaliate against
the oppressor in kind. To proceed:
1.
Peace be upon he who follows the guidance: People
of America this talk of mine is for you and
concerns the ideal way to prevent another
Manhattan, and deals with the war and its causes
and results.
Before I begin, I say to you that security is an
indispensable pillar of human life and that free
men do not forfeit their security, contrary to
Bush's claim that we hate freedom.
If so,
then let him explain to us why we don't strike
for example - Sweden? And we know that freedom-haters
don't possess defiant spirits like those of the
19 - may Allah have mercy on them.
No, we fight because we are free men who don't
sleep under oppression. We want to restore
freedom to our nation, just as you lay waste to
our nation. So shall we lay waste to yours.
No one except a dumb thief plays with the
security of others and then makes himself believe
he will be secure. Whereas thinking people, when
disaster strikes, make it their priority to look
for its causes, in order to prevent it happening
again.
But I am amazed at you. Even though we are in the
fourth year after the events of September 11th,
Bush is still engaged in distortion, deception
and hiding from you the real causes. And thus,
the reasons are still there for a repeat of what
occurred.
So I shall talk to you about the story behind
those events and shall tell you truthfully about
the moments in which the decision was taken, for
you to consider.
I say
to you, Allah knows that it had never occurred to
us to strike the towers. But after it became
unbearable and we witnessed the oppression and
tyranny of the American/Israeli coalition against
our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it came to
my mind.
The events that affected my soul in a direct way
started in 1982 when America permitted the
Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American Sixth
Fleet helped them in that. This bombardment began
and many were killed and injured and others were
terrorised and displaced.
I couldn't forget those moving scenes, blood and
severed limbs, women and children sprawled
everywhere. Houses destroyed along with their
occupants and high rises demolished over their
residents, rockets raining down on our home
without mercy.
The situation was like a crocodile meeting a
helpless child, powerless except for his screams.
Does the crocodile understand a conversation that
doesn't include a weapon? And the whole world saw
and heard but it didn't respond.
In those difficult moments many hard-to-describe
ideas bubbled in my soul, but in the end they
produced an intense feeling of rejection of
tyranny, and gave birth to a strong resolve to
punish the oppressors.
And as I looked at those demolished towers in
Lebanon, it entered my mind that we should punish
the oppressor in kind and that we should destroy
towers in America in order that they taste some
of what we tasted and so that they be deterred
from killing our women and children.
And that day, it was confirmed to me that
oppression and the intentional killing of
innocent women and children is a deliberate
American policy. Destruction is freedom and
democracy, while resistance is terrorism and
intolerance.
This means the oppressing and embargoing to death
of millions as Bush Sr did in Iraq in the
greatest mass slaughter of children mankind has
ever known, and it means the throwing of millions
of pounds of bombs and explosives at millions of
children - also in Iraq - as Bush Jr did, in
order to remove an old agent and replace him with
a new puppet to assist in the pilfering of Iraq's
oil and other outrages.
So with these images and their like as their
background, the events of September 11th came as
a reply to those great wrongs, should a man be
blamed for defending his sanctuary?
Is defending oneself and punishing the aggressor
in kind, objectionable terrorism? If it is such,
then it is unavoidable for us.
This is the message which I sought to communicate
to you in word and deed, repeatedly, for years
before September 11th.
And you can read this, if you wish, in my
interview with Scott in Time Magazine in 1996, or
with Peter Arnett on CNN in 1997, or my meeting
with John Weiner in 1998.
You
can observe it practically, if you wish, in Kenya
and Tanzania and in Aden. And you can read it in
my interview with Abdul Bari Atwan, as well as my
interviews with Robert Fisk.
The latter is one of your compatriots and co-religionists
and I consider him to be neutral. So are the
pretenders of freedom at the White House and the
channels controlled by them able to run an
interview with him? So that he may relay to the
American people what he has understood from us to
be the reasons for our fight against you?
If
you were to avoid these reasons, you will have
taken the correct path that will lead America to
the security that it was in before September 11th.
This concerned the causes of the war.
As for its results, they have been, by the grace
of Allah, positive and enormous, and have, by all
standards, exceeded all expectations. This is due
to many factors, chief among them, that we have
found it difficult to deal with the Bush
administration in light of the resemblance it
bears to the regimes in our countries, half of
which are ruled by the military and the other
half which are ruled by the sons of kings and
presidents.
Our
experience with them is lengthy, and both types
are replete with those who are characterised by
pride, arrogance, greed and misappropriation of
wealth. This resemblance began after the visits
of Bush Sr to the region.
At a time when some of our compatriots were
dazzled by America and hoping that these visits
would have an effect on our countries, all of a
sudden he was affected by those monarchies and
military regimes, and became envious of their
remaining decades in their positions, to embezzle
the public wealth of the nation without
supervision or accounting.
So he
took dictatorship and suppression of freedoms to
his son and they named it the Patriot Act, under
the pretence of fighting terrorism. In addition,
Bush sanctioned the installing of sons as state
governors, and didn't forget to import expertise
in election fraud from the region's presidents to
Florida to be made use of in moments of
difficulty.
All
that we have mentioned has made it easy for us to
provoke and bait this administration. All that we
have to do is to send two mujahidin to the
furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on
which is written al-Qaida, in order to make the
generals race there to cause America to suffer
human, economic, and political losses without
their achieving for it anything of note other
than some benefits for their private companies.
This
is in addition to our having experience in using
guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to
fight tyrannical superpowers, as we, alongside
the mujahidin, bled Russia for 10 years, until it
went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in
defeat.
All Praise is due to Allah.
So we are continuing this policy in bleeding
America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing,
and nothing is too great for Allah.
That
being said, those who say that al-Qaida has won
against the administration in the White House or
that the administration has lost in this war have
not been precise, because when one scrutinises
the results, one cannot say that al-Qaida is the
sole factor in achieving those spectacular gains.
Rather,
the policy of the White House that demands the
opening of war fronts to keep busy their various
corporations - whether they be working in the
field of arms or oil or reconstruction - has
helped al-Qaida to achieve these enormous results.
And so it has appeared to some analysts and
diplomats that the White House and us are playing
as one team towards the economic goals of the
United States, even if the intentions differ.
And it was to these sorts of notions and their
like that the British diplomat and others were
referring in their lectures at the Royal
Institute of International Affairs. [When they
pointed out that] for example, al-Qaida spent $500,000
on the event, while America, in the incident and
its aftermath, lost - according to the lowest
estimate - more than $500 billion.
Meaning
that every dollar of al-Qaida defeated a million
dollars by the permission of Allah, besides the
loss of a huge number of jobs.
As
for the size of the economic deficit, it has
reached record astronomical numbers estimated to
total more than a trillion dollars.
And even more dangerous and bitter for America is
that the mujahidin recently forced Bush to resort
to emergency funds to continue the fight in
Afghanistan and Iraq, which is evidence of the
success of the bleed-until-bankruptcy plan - with
Allah's permission.
It is
true that this shows that al-Qaida has gained,
but on the other hand, it shows that the Bush
administration has also gained, something of
which anyone who looks at the size of the
contracts acquired by the shady Bush
administration-linked mega-corporations, like
Halliburton and its kind, will be convinced. And
it all shows that the real loser is ... you.
It is
the American people and their economy. And for
the record, we had agreed with the Commander-General
Muhammad Ataa, Allah have mercy on him, that all
the operations should be carried out within 20
minutes, before Bush and his administration
notice.
It never occurred to us that the commander-in-chief
of the American armed forces would abandon 50,000
of his citizens in the twin towers to face those
great horrors alone, the time when they most
needed him.
But because it seemed to him that occupying
himself by talking to the little girl about the
goat and its butting was more important than
occupying himself with the planes and their
butting of the skyscrapers, we were given three
times the period required to execute the
operations - all praise is due to Allah.
And
it's no secret to you that the thinkers and
perceptive ones from among the Americans warned
Bush before the war and told him: "All that
you want for securing America and removing the
weapons of mass destruction - assuming they exist
- is available to you, and the nations of the
world are with you in the inspections, and it is
in the interest of America that it not be thrust
into an unjustified war with an unknown outcome."
But
the darkness of the black gold blurred his vision
and insight, and he gave priority to private
interests over the public interests of America.
So the war went ahead, the death toll rose, the
American economy bled, and Bush became embroiled
in the swamps of Iraq that threaten his future.
He fits the saying "like the naughty she-goat
who used her hoof to dig up a knife from under
the earth".
So I
say to you, over 15,000 of our people have been
killed and tens of thousands injured, while more
than a thousand of you have been killed and more
than 10,000 injured. And Bush's hands are stained
with the blood of all those killed from both
sides, all for the sake of oil and keeping their
private companies in business.
Be aware that it is the nation who punishes the
weak man when he causes the killing of one of its
citizens for money, while letting the powerful
one get off, when he causes the killing of more
than 1000 of its sons, also for money.
And
the same goes for your allies in Palestine. They
terrorise the women and children, and kill and
capture the men as they lie sleeping with their
families on the mattresses, that you may recall
that for every action, there is a reaction.
Finally,
it behooves you to reflect on the last wills and
testaments of the thousands who left you on the
11th as they gestured in despair. They are
important testaments, which should be studied and
researched.
Among the most important of what I read in them
was some prose in their gestures before the
collapse, where they say: "How mistaken we
were to have allowed the White House to implement
its aggressive foreign policies against the weak
without supervision."
It is
as if they were telling you, the people of
America: "Hold to account those who have
caused us to be killed, and happy is he who
learns from others' mistakes."
And
among that which I read in their gestures is a
verse of poetry. "Injustice chases its
people, and how unhealthy the bed of tyranny."
As has been said: "An ounce of prevention is
better than a pound of cure."
And
know that: "It is better to return to the
truth than persist in error." And that the
wise man doesn't squander his security, wealth
and children for the sake of the liar in the
White House.
In
conclusion, I tell you in truth, that your
security is not in the hands of Kerry, nor Bush,
nor al-Qaida. No.
Your security is in your own hands. And every
state that doesn't play with our security has
automatically guaranteed its own security.
And
Allah is our Guardian and Helper, while you have
no Guardian or Helper. All peace be upon he who
follows the Guidance.
Okay,
some of this stuff is inaccurate, and the
incessant divine ass-kissing make him sound a lot
like Pat Robertson. But what the rational reader
will walk away with is that bin Laden has done
exactly what he told us he would: He has detailed
why he attacked us and how we could avoid another
attack. And his rationale is one that anybody
from New Jersey can relate to: If you mess with
us, well mess with you back.
But
we reelected Bush, and Bushs stated policy
is to continue to mess with . . . well, everybody.
Our moral values president is
stacking up Iraqi bodies in Fallujah, knowing all
the while that the 296,000 or so Fallujahians who
arent supporting the insurgents are also
losing their lives and homes, courtesy of
American bombs. Does he really think that after
returning to their city to find their homes
destroyed and their neighbors dead, the citizens
of Fallujah will shout, Weve lost
everything! Hurray for America!? My guess
is that theyll reach into the rubble, pull
an AK-47 from the hands of a dead combatant, and
head down to the neighborhood insurgent
recruitment office. And the line to get into that
office will likely extend around the pile of
rubble that used to be the block.
But,
of course, all of this talk is wasted on the ears
of the Bush supporters. What wont be wasted
on them is the next terrorist attack that they
have invited. Whereas Bushs lie-based
policy of unilateral aggression could be blamed
on Bush alone before the election, 51% of the
voters have now approved of that policy. Yes,
friends, the American people have sanctioned a
policy of messing with other nations even when
there is no evidence that those nations present a
threat to the United States. Osama bin Laden told
us that if we mess with them, theyll mess
back. So do the math. How many bin Ladens do you
think will rise from the ashes of Iraq? A hundred?
A thousand? And with the Bush
Administrations complete failure to find
bin Laden and to halt nuclear activity in North
Korea and Iran, its
just a matter of time before one of these bin
Ladens, present or future, gets his hands on the
answer to his prayers.
So,
all of you conservative Christians out there,
tell me: Which city will it be? Washington? Los
Angeles? And what day will it hit? April 23rd?
August 1st? I know! How about
Christmas Day? That December day, tacked onto the
Pagans Winter Solistice celebration long
ago, could just as easily be co-opted by
terrorists. Better yet, what shall we name the
giant hole where the city used to stand? How
about the Conservative Hole-yland?
Whats
that? You say youre not laughing? Well,
neither am I. The stupidity and utter blindness
displayed by the conservative Christians in the
voting booth has sealed our fates. And despite
our longing to have a rational foreign policy, we
liberals will wind up dying right alongside the
morons whose votes made the next attack not only
possible, but damn likely. And lest you think
that Im a political opportunist, be warned
that the day after that next attack, if Im
still alive, I will be demanding not only the
resignation of everybody in the Bush
Administration, but that a bonfire be made from
the voter registration cards of everybody who
supported Bushs second term. If you want to
pray in the privacy of your homes and churches,
be my guest. But those on the right who use
prayer to drown out their own rational thoughts
have no business in the voting booth.
In
the meantime, enjoy your victory, Christ-servatives.
Thanks to you, gays will officially be
discriminated against, stem cell research will
continue at a snails pace, and bin
Ladens next move will have the support of
most of the Arab world and the unspoken smirking
approval of everyone else.
So,
after the next attack, which uninvolved oil-rich
land shall we destroy in retaliation? Personally,
I would vote for Texas.
11/17/04
Unless
otherwise noted, all original content and
headlines are © The Angry Liberal . Contact The
Angry Liberal for
reprint rights.
|